The fourteenth Annual Third Party Logistics (3PL) Study examining the current global market for logistics outsourcing was recently released. The study surveyed shippers and logistics service providers in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America. Key findings included:
* The economic downturn has created significant challenges for both shippers and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) – 82% of shippers are employing cost-cutting tactics and 60% are rethinking their supply chains and relationships with 3PLs
* 88% of shippers feel that IT-based logistics services are important, but only 42% are satisfied with the capabilities of their provider – as a result of this IT capability gap, shipper respondents reported a lack of the key performance indicators, alerts and visibility required for an adaptive supply chain and 3PLs reported similar difficulties in getting the data and commitment they need from shippers
* There are significant differences between how 3PLs evaluate their role in the supply chain and how they are viewed by shippers – 59% of shippers feel their use of 3PLs has a positive effect on customer service compared to 88% of 3PL respondents
* Shipper respondents devote an average of between 47% (in North America) and 66% (in Europe) of their total logistics expenditures to outsourcing and this is expected to increase in the next five years.
“Shipper-3PL relationships are being impacted significantly by the prevailing uncertainty and economic volatility in global markets,” said Dr. C. John Langley Jr., Professor of Supply Chain Management, Georgia Institute of Technology. “It is very important for 3PLs to mitigate or reduce any financial risk or service level impact that this may cause.”
Economic uncertainty and the use of 3PLs
Economic volatility has challenged shippers and 3PLs alike to contend with factors such as unpredictable demand, instability in fuel costs and currency valuation, and excess inventory. In response, not only are shippers attempting to cut costs, 77% are also seeking to improve forecasting and inventory management.
Cost reduction and improved reliability in services are the main factors likely to increase shipper respondents’ use of 3PLs. This includes converting fixed to variable costs (59%), expanding to new markets or offering new products (56%), and restructuring the supply chain network to improve financial performance (48%).
Read the rest of the mhia.org article here.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Monday, August 24, 2009
Why 3PLs need to build their brand
Over the past several years, the global third party logistics (3PL) industry has changed dramatically. While the demand for 3PL services has grown steadily, the major logistics service providers have expanded their geographical reach and broadened their service offerings. At the same time, the structure of the industry has changed not only through mergers and acquisitions, but also through new market entry by many companies, including some funded by private equity investors. 3PL company reorganizations and name changes have become commonplace.
These changes have fostered a degree of buyer confusion in the marketplace, and many large 3PLs fear a possible “commoditization” of their services in the eyes of those who currently buy their services or are considering doing so. If this is indeed occurring, existing and potential customers will become increasingly indifferent when choosing between logistics service providers. And this, in turn, will intensify the price compression pressures that already plague the 3PL industry.
A key question that needs to be asked here is: What are executives of those 3PL companies doing in response to these market developments? Specifically, what steps have large 3PLs taken in recent years to differentiate their service offerings in the marketplace while strengthening their brands? Further, is there more that those executives should be doing in those areas?
This article addresses the typical steps that companies should take in building, refining, and strengthening their brands—and in particular examines recent attempts by major 3PLs to do so. Branding literature forms the basis for discussion of the general case, and the branding steps taken by large 3PLs were documented through data generated during 2006 and 2007 in surveys of the CEOs of major 3PLs operating in three geographic regions: North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. (For more on the surveys, see accompanying sidebar). We conclude with suggestions for 3PL industry executives concerning their future branding efforts—and the potential positive implications of these efforts on the buyers of these services.
Read the rest of the scmr.com article here.
These changes have fostered a degree of buyer confusion in the marketplace, and many large 3PLs fear a possible “commoditization” of their services in the eyes of those who currently buy their services or are considering doing so. If this is indeed occurring, existing and potential customers will become increasingly indifferent when choosing between logistics service providers. And this, in turn, will intensify the price compression pressures that already plague the 3PL industry.
A key question that needs to be asked here is: What are executives of those 3PL companies doing in response to these market developments? Specifically, what steps have large 3PLs taken in recent years to differentiate their service offerings in the marketplace while strengthening their brands? Further, is there more that those executives should be doing in those areas?
This article addresses the typical steps that companies should take in building, refining, and strengthening their brands—and in particular examines recent attempts by major 3PLs to do so. Branding literature forms the basis for discussion of the general case, and the branding steps taken by large 3PLs were documented through data generated during 2006 and 2007 in surveys of the CEOs of major 3PLs operating in three geographic regions: North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. (For more on the surveys, see accompanying sidebar). We conclude with suggestions for 3PL industry executives concerning their future branding efforts—and the potential positive implications of these efforts on the buyers of these services.
Read the rest of the scmr.com article here.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Trucking news: ATA reports For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index down 2.4 percent in June
On a year-over-year basis, June 2008 tonnage sank 13.6 percent
After a 3.2 percent up tick in May, the American Trucking Associations (ATA) advanced seasonally adjusted For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index dropped 2.4 percent in June.
This is the third time in the last four months this index has dropped, with April and March down 2.2 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively. At the beginning of the year, the index had a promising start, with a 4.5 percent cumulative gain in January and February. The decline in the advanced seasonally adjusted For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index to 99.8 (2000=100) was not significant enough to completely offset May’s performance, according to the ATA.
Meanwhile, the not seasonally adjusted (NSA) index, which represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by the fleets before any seasonal adjustment, was 107.3 in June. This represents a 5.2 percent improvement from May, and if this trend were to continue it could mean that tonnage is slowly rebounding. Year-over-year NSA index data was not made available by the ATA. The NSA has shown gains the last three months.
As defined by the ATA, the not seasonally-adjusted index is assembled by adding up all the monthly tonnage data reported by the survey respondents (ATA member carriers) for the latest two months. Then a monthly percent change is calculated and then applied to the index number for the first month. Some industry analysts maintain that the not seasonally-adjusted index is more useful, because it is comprised of what truckers actually haul.
Even through the NSA showed a sequential gain, it appears there will be a long way to go before tonnage truly comes back to pre-recession levels. On a year-over-year basis, June 2008 tonnage sank 13.6 percent, which represents the biggest annual decline in this current cycle. May’s year-over-year decline was 11 percent, and April’s was 13.2 percent.
Bob Costello, ATA Chief Economist, said in a statement that it is likely tonnage levels will remain at current levels for the foreseeable future.
Read the rest of the logisticsmgmt.com here.
After a 3.2 percent up tick in May, the American Trucking Associations (ATA) advanced seasonally adjusted For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index dropped 2.4 percent in June.
This is the third time in the last four months this index has dropped, with April and March down 2.2 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively. At the beginning of the year, the index had a promising start, with a 4.5 percent cumulative gain in January and February. The decline in the advanced seasonally adjusted For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index to 99.8 (2000=100) was not significant enough to completely offset May’s performance, according to the ATA.
Meanwhile, the not seasonally adjusted (NSA) index, which represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by the fleets before any seasonal adjustment, was 107.3 in June. This represents a 5.2 percent improvement from May, and if this trend were to continue it could mean that tonnage is slowly rebounding. Year-over-year NSA index data was not made available by the ATA. The NSA has shown gains the last three months.
As defined by the ATA, the not seasonally-adjusted index is assembled by adding up all the monthly tonnage data reported by the survey respondents (ATA member carriers) for the latest two months. Then a monthly percent change is calculated and then applied to the index number for the first month. Some industry analysts maintain that the not seasonally-adjusted index is more useful, because it is comprised of what truckers actually haul.
Even through the NSA showed a sequential gain, it appears there will be a long way to go before tonnage truly comes back to pre-recession levels. On a year-over-year basis, June 2008 tonnage sank 13.6 percent, which represents the biggest annual decline in this current cycle. May’s year-over-year decline was 11 percent, and April’s was 13.2 percent.
Bob Costello, ATA Chief Economist, said in a statement that it is likely tonnage levels will remain at current levels for the foreseeable future.
Read the rest of the logisticsmgmt.com here.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Logistics News: U.S. Logistics Costs Drop for First Time in Six Years, Benchmark Report Says
If American transportation and logistics experts got the feeling the past year that the overall U.S. business logistics pie was shrinking, they were correct.
For the first time in six years, total spending on U.S. logistics dropped to $1.3 trillion last year, a decrease of $49 billion from 2007. That’s the gist of the 20th Annual “State of Logistics Report” released by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) on Wednesday.
The annual respected benchmark report revealed the financial damage done to the sector by the ongoing recession. After rising by more than 50 percent the previous five years, business logistics costs fell to 9.4 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product last year. That is down from 10.1 percent in 2007. By way of comparison, that figure was 12.3 percent of GDP in 1985.
Transportation costs rose 2 percent, but that was not enough to offset the 13.2 percent decline in inventory carrying costs, primarily due to record-low interest rates last year. Transportation ($872 billion) now accounts for 6.1 percent of nominal GDP while inventory carrying costs ($420 billion) account for 2.9 percent of GDP.
Trucking, which accounts for 78 percent of transport by revenue and half of all business logistics cost, was particularly hard hit, rising just 1.3 percent compared with 4.4 percent for the other modes (rail, barge, air cargo, oil pipelines and forwarders).
For shippers, this has resulted in bargain transport rates, especially in trucking and ocean transport, according to Rosalyn Wilson, the long-time author of the SoL report.
“Abundant capacity, particularly in trucking and ocean shipping, push rates down (last year), often below costs,” Wilson said. “Many companies have not survived the prolonged downturn. Many more will not survive the upcoming months as we continue to ride out the recession.”
As a result of the shakeout—more than 3,000 motor carriers ceased operations last year, taking out approximately 7 percent of truck capacity—supply chains are being redefined and processes changing, Wilson said.
“The industry will emerge more efficient and resilient,” Wilson predicted.
Nevertheless, Wilson added, recovery will be a “longer and more difficult journey” for the logistics industry as it awaits meaningful economic recovery, which, Wilson said, will not come quickly.
“It is becoming more apparent that we will see an end to the decline by the end of this year but not a quick recovery,” she said.
One indicator of that is the sharp, record rise in inventory-to-sales ratios, which Wilson called an “unwelcome sign” of a slow recovery. Even with historic inventory reduction rates, the inventory-to-sales ratio skyrocketed from a low last June of 1.25 to 1.46 by December. That is the swiftest rise in that benchmark since 1982. And Wilson said it occurred across the entire distribution chain—wholesale, manufacturing, and retail.
Read the rest of the Supply Chain Management Review article here.
Friday, May 22, 2009
Third-party logistics/global logistics: A lackluster year for 3PLs, says new Armstrong survey
Dick Armstrong, chairman and CEO of Armstrong & Associates, Inc.--a supply chain market research and consulting firm specializing in 3PL market research--said his most recent survey paints a complex picture.
“After 11 modest months in 2008, third-party logistics revenues dove in December and have remained depressed in 2009,” he said in a statement. “While a few third-party logistics providers (3PLs) could drown, most are treading water and some are swimming strongly.”
Armstrong’s analysis shows gross revenue (turnover) for 3PLs down by 8.8 percent for 2009. Net revenues (gross margins) were less impacted for many non-asset transportation managers and leading value-added warehousing 3PLs.
Expeditors, C.H. Robinson, Kuehne + Nagel and other major transportation managers report net revenues decreased 3 percent to 10 percent. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDAs) and earnings before interest and tax (EBITs) fell proportionately. Additionally, net revenues are expected to be down another 5 percent this year for the transportation management group.
Read the rest of the article from logisticsmgmt.com here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
